# CAIBI benchmark result: ESP32 3-Axis Camera Slider

Results template 2.0 · Brief three-axis-camera-slider@1.0

Use the unchanged standard prompt: https://caibi.app/benchmarks/three-axis-camera-slider/brief.txt
Submit this report and original evidence: https://caibi.app/benchmarks/three-axis-camera-slider/#share-result

Scores are contributor assessments. Distinguish predicted results from observed physical tests. Unknown values are not zero.

## Scoring scale
- 1: Missing or unusable
- 2: Major gaps or corrections
- 3: Usable in part; work remains
- 4: Meets most needs; minor corrections
- 5: Meets the stated requirements
- Not evaluated: insufficient evidence

## Run identity

### Brief and version
three-axis-camera-slider@1.0

### Project
Not recorded

### Prompt used
Not recorded

### Changes to the prompt
Not recorded

### Evidence type
Not recorded

### Selected model ID
Not recorded

### Model shown
Not recorded

### Exact version / snapshot
Not recorded

### Model list date
Not recorded

### App, API or local interface
Not recorded

### Run / build date
Not recorded

### Tools, settings and run conditions
Not recorded

### Comparison group
conditions-not-recorded

### Original run reference
Not recorded

## Section scores and findings

### Design and files
Dimensions, interfaces and editable files meet the brief. Record what was actually delivered and any missing or invalid files.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

### Parts and cutting / printing list
Quantities, units, exact variants, compatibility, materials, tolerances and fabrication allowances are complete and consistent.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

### UK and US purchasing
Direct purchase links, checked stock, variants, pack sizes, taxes, shipping and regional totals are usable. Name missing regions or unverified details.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

### Assembly and commissioning
Numbered steps, wiring, firmware, setup and troubleshooting are complete, ordered and understandable.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

### Functionality
Requirements and acceptance tests are addressed. For a model run, score the proposed solution; for a physical build, score observed tests only.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

### Ease of building and using
Skills, tools, corrections, debugging and usability are clearly accounted for. Distinguish expected difficulty from first-hand experience.

Score: Not evaluated

Findings: Not recorded

## Evidence and outcome

### Complete evidence link
Not recorded

### Design, parts and assembly outcome
Not recorded

### Acceptance tests
Not recorded

### Human corrections and substitutions
Not recorded

## Cost and timing

### Proposed UK cost (£)
Not recorded

### Proposed US cost ($)
Not recorded

### Actual UK spend (£)
Not recorded

### Actual US spend ($)
Not recorded

### Cost scope and purchasing evidence
Not recorded

### Estimated lead time (days)
Not recorded

### Actual lead time (days)
Not recorded

### Estimated hands-on time (hours)
Not recorded

### Actual hands-on time (hours)
Not recorded

### Estimated machine time (hours)
Not recorded

### Actual machine time (hours)
Not recorded

### Estimated elapsed time (hours)
Not recorded

### Actual elapsed time (hours)
Not recorded

## Notes and credit

### Additional notes
Not recorded

### Contributor display name
Not recorded

## Supporting images and documents
No attachments listed

Attachments are not embedded in this report. Keep and submit the original files. Never treat this download as a submission receipt.